The sentence that stood out to me
the most out of the readings that we have completed so far comes from the
Compassionate Critical Listening reading. “Performance scholar Dwight
Conquergood (1985) argues that dialogic performance is “one path to genuine
understanding of others.”” Within this passage from the reading, that quote
really speaks to me. Genuine understanding is not something that people seem to
value in this day and age. So often within a conversation people are so
concerned with what they are going to say next that they barely pay any
attention to the person that is speaking to them. That is why dialogue is so important.
If we take the time to actually understand and comprehend what other people are
saying without getting caught up in our own agenda then the number of problems
that can be solved or avoided would be astounding. This form of listening and
communication really reminds me of the phenomenological tradition of
communication theorizing.
The phenomenological tradition
focuses on the exchange of information and experiences between people without any
sort of goal in mind. This meaning that one person isn’t trying to change the
other person’s mind on a given subject; they are simply sharing ideas and
experiences for the sake of sharing ideas and experiences. True understanding
is what is really important; other than there should be no goal to the conversation,
no winners or losers.
So, the parallel that I see between
these two ideas is the need for understanding, not a need to win. In my
opinion, this sort of meaningful exchange between people is fairly hard to come
by. Many interactions, especially those with differing views, can become literal
shouting matches in which one side ends up being the “winner.” However, when
there is a dialogic exchange in which the purpose is solely to understand, then
those involved really move forward. When there is no winners or losers in an
exchange, everybody wins.
No comments:
Post a Comment