The text book, A Critical/Cultural
Introduction by John T. Warren and Deana L. Forsett, discusses the concept of
articulate contact. The authors define this as the language in our world It is
the concept of negations between people to create a meaning. The authors
discuss how we need the language to create an understanding of things that are
represented. The authors next discuss how the language is constructive. It
produces meaning contexts and relationships. The language helps us move through
the world as it makes our word. The language is a tool in which society can communicate
and interact with each other. Without the language, the communication would be challenging.
The language is important. If you were in a different country, there is a
feeling of being lost without the concept of the countries language. It has an impact
on how society functions. There needs to be a form of language to move around
the society.
Ken Makovsky discusses, in the
Forbes magazine, the ability to communicate in a foreign country. Makovsky
shares how the business language can be misinterpreted due to the nuance. This can
lead to a misunderstanding within the business world. He also discusses how the
words that we use can be misunderstood due to the cultural bias. This article
has a formal relation to the articulate contact and language. The words that we
use have a different meaning or interpretation depending on the culture. Each
culture has its own unique way of interpreting the meaning. From Makovskys article
he shares the example of how a Dutch businessman and a British business man use
the same tone of words to present an idea yet the words are interpreted in a different
fashion. This is related to how each country uses the language in the context
that fits their own culture.
Another way that the it is
important to understand the articulate contact is using awareness on how we
express our language in front of others. Makovsky discusses how different countries
have different approaches towards how they give and receive feedback. He uses
the example of the Chinese manager that is trained to never criticize a colleague
in front of others in a public setting. The other example is how the American culture
is taught how to wrap positive message around negative messages. The third example is how the French are taught
to give criticism in a passionate manner and to provide positive feedback in a sparingly
fashion.
The main idea is that we need the language to survive
within our own culture. The other concept is that it is important to be aware
of the differences that each culture has when it comes to communicating with
each other and others in the society.
No comments:
Post a Comment